Consequently, it seems convenient not to be satisfied with the acquired pragmatism. To prevent the state or the market from be fetishized, in the form of superior rationality, a brief historical review becomes opportune. It allows visualising not only the continued coexistence of the two logics but also the combination variable between the two. The first and foremost point to note is that in Latin America – unlike Europe – a capitalist society were not established before the development of the state during the nineteenth century, (RDF AND JSON-LD UseCases). Capitalism is not a given historical element that precedes state regulation. This has an inevitable consequence for the configuration of the social order: it the State that assumes the task of introducing a modern society. From this derives the specificity of state interventi Does the Education Administration have enough accountability onism explicitly dedicated to executing a ‘model of development’ for society. That is, state intervention does not correspond so much to a ‘corrective’ market function as to a deliberate effort promote economic and social development. This implies, on the other hand, that the market economy depends not only on the state initiative but also has a close relationship with the state reason (national question, social issue). Economy The Latin American economy is considered a developing economy since much of its population is the primary sector. By Marcelonamura, only a few countries have significant portions of the economically active community in the secondary industry. However, the tertiary sector has grown the most in almost all Latin American countries.>