As each section is being completed i would like to read is progress to make sure its on the right track and revisions are not made last minute. This paper requires: Preceis, Abstract, Key words, Introduction , Methods/results, discussion/ comments, and conclusion. References About the research: Cytotechnologist identified Endometrial cells(EMS) over 45 years of age then it is given to pathologist for review and final diagnosis. Pathologist review the slide and have tacked on a diagnosis of Atypical Squamous cells (ASCUS). out of 227 cases with EMs over 45 years, 18 were given ASCUS. I am trying to identify if these 18 cases were truly ASCUS and not an over call. Three certified for Cytotechnologist with over 10 years of experience have reviewed these cases. Using a scale from 0-5, 0 being would not call ASCUS and 5 would believe the case is ASCUS then comment why or why not it has met the criteria.. Three students will review these cases; grade using the scale and comment why or why not it satisfied criteria. HPV Status was pull and a search for follow up treatment was looked up. I am trying to figure out what compelled these pathologist to call […]

The post Endometrial cells in women over 45 years: Clinical Significance of ASCUS in diagnosis appeared first on FreelanceWritersPlanet.com.