Write a paper analyzing the Dan Harmond and Justin Roiland tv show Rick and Morty. You might consider
any of the following areas/prompts as inspiration for the theme of your paper:
Select a particular theme in Rick and Morty for analysis. What particular message is Dan Harmon/Roiland
presenting on that idea or concept, or what idea do you as an audience receive on that concept as a work,
and why is that concept an important intellectual consideration, whether artistically, philosophically,
ethically or socially.
Select a particular character from Rick and Morty for an in-depth character analysis. What does that
character represent as a figure, and what truth of human experience/existence are the writers trying to
portray through that character.
Examine the use of science in Rick and Morty, particularly complex scientific frontiers/postmodern
concepts such as quantum physics and time travel. How is science portrayed in Rick and Morty, and what
insights are revealed on the scientific realms? What is interesting about that portrayal of scientific
concepts?
Find and rebut (or support) a critique of Rick and Morty, or in lieu of that, a critique of humorous animated
entertainment that can be analogous to/extended to Rick and Morty.
Analyze issues of gender of Rick and Morty, a comedy that has at its center a typical/untypical nuclear
family including all the dynamics of roles between father/daughter, husband/wife/ mother/son/daughter,
and brother/sister. What is being said of interest about the dynamic between genders and their social
roles?
Discuss the aesthetic aspects of Rick and Morty-that is, how it is presented artistically. You might consider
its use of imagery, the quality of its production, balance between visuals and text, the uniqueness of its
form or vision: I suggest for this question you have some knowledge of art history and animation.
Do a structural analysis of Rick and Morty, analyzing Harmon’s use of story cycles and other plot
structuring elements, but go beyond what has already been covered in class (you might use Joseph
Campbell’s material to start). What is unique/interesting/effective about Harmon’s structure, what is he
trying to achieve, what is the effect on the viewer and how is form interconnected with content.
Make a proposal to me on your own question and topic
Sample Solution
The Success of a Romantic Relationship: Why Individual Growth Matters GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination self-awareness quoteWhen two individuals start a sentimental relationship, they first demonstrate their best highlights to accomplices so as to keep them intrigued. Be that as it may, inevitably, routine sets in and it appears there is the same old thing to find. Hence, enthusiasm, which has been holding the relationship together, blurs away and proceeding with the relationship may get troublesome. As a rule, love and sentiment are comprehended as a sort of converging of individualistic accomplices, when every individual tries to satisfy their own needs to the detriment of another, rather than attempting to develop and create. At the point when one or the two accomplices quit developing, the relationship enters a phase of stagnation, which may shield them from carrying on with a glad life or end in partition. “Connections resemble a move, with obvious vitality dashing to and fro between accomplices. A few connections are the moderate, dim move of death” (Dowling 79). With this stated, it is significant for the achievement of a relationship for its members to continually search for ways for singular development. As per ongoing examinations directed in the United Kingdom, an attention on disloyalty as the primary driver for separate has moved onto a marvel called “dropping out of affection” (Dowling 102). This marvel is reflected in the reality there is the same old thing to find about the other individual and the reasons that made them experience passionate feelings for blur away as time passes by. Expressed compactly, holding fast to a “safe place” in the relationship is somewhat hazardous. An agreeable relationship is set apart by effectively overlooking self-awareness. All things considered, the fact of the matter is improving and dealing with yourself helps assemble a superior and more extravagant relationship with your accomplice. The primary motivation behind why it is hard for individuals to leave connections which have become vapid is just a couple of consider individual improvement as one of the key factors in fixing their organization. Couples need to remain fascinating for one another, as when there is nothing new to find, the relationship can get delicate. Moreover, unscripted TV dramas us how to be a couple: each accomplice ought to have high confidence to adapt better to the inescapable unfriendly issues that are introduced in one’s life (Dowling 56). “Accomplices with low confidence read a lot into issues, considering them to be an indication that their accomplice’s expressions of love and responsibility may be fading. They at that point discredit their accomplice and diminish closeness. Being less touchy to dismissal, nonetheless, accomplices with high confidence certify their accomplice notwithstanding any danger. Incidentally, a ceaseless requirement for acknowledgment may bring about low confidence, individuals seeing indications of dismissal where none exist, unnecessarily debilitating connections” (Murray 202). In any case, numerous individuals don’t understand that keeping up a relationship is close to home work. Unrecognized and uncertain issues may bring about an arrangement of dissatisfactions in the relationship, which proceed until an individual understands the genuine explanations behind disappointment. There are a few fundamental things to recall about a solid relationship. Numerous couples feel threatened, as they accept they will be misjudged, chuckled at, or that the relationship will break on account of what they said. This dread appears to be intolerable, however trust is basic (Murray 200). People with higher confidence are increasingly genuine about what they need and need from their accomplices. They talk about what the relationship is missing as opposed to holding up until the accomplice surmises the potential issues that have emerged. Another significant factor is having a public activity outside of a sentimental relationship. It is very hurtful for couples to harp just on one another. New impressions, contacts, and colleagues are critical for a sound relationship. Accomplices ought to likewise try to be intriguing to one another, learn new exercises to have new points to discuss, and search for novel approaches to get to know each other. The budgetary side of the issue additionally assumes its job. At the point when the two accomplices are financially autonomous, it is more uncertain one will feel worried about being the sole provider and the other will feel shaky as a result of having no consistent salary (Dowling 124). There are no careful guidelines with regards to such a private wonder as a sentimental relationship. Each couple should look for what works best for them, as each couple is remarkable. Be that as it may, it tends to be sensibly expressed that so as to construct a solid and enduring relationship, couples should give more consideration to their own characters. It is very troublesome, or even inconceivable, to improve the relationship itself, or change a few highlights of an accomplice which one doesn’t care for. The key point is to rehash yourself. In spite of being an appearing mystery, the more consideration you pay to your own life and advancement, the more extravagant the relationship will turn into. References Dowling, Richard. “Not in a Mess: Romantic Relationships.” Time 20 Nov. 2001. 56-58. Print Murray, Anna. Taking It to the Next Level in Your Relationship. New York: Black Bourbon Press, 2008. Print.>
The Success of a Romantic Relationship: Why Individual Growth Matters GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination self-awareness quoteWhen two individuals start a sentimental relationship, they first demonstrate their best highlights to accomplices so as to keep them intrigued. Be that as it may, inevitably, routine sets in and it appears there is the same old thing to find. Hence, enthusiasm, which has been holding the relationship together, blurs away and proceeding with the relationship may get troublesome. As a rule, love and sentiment are comprehended as a sort of converging of individualistic accomplices, when every individual tries to satisfy their own needs to the detriment of another, rather than attempting to develop and create. At the point when one or the two accomplices quit developing, the relationship enters a phase of stagnation, which may shield them from carrying on with a glad life or end in partition. “Connections resemble a move, with obvious vitality dashing to and fro between accomplices. A few connections are the moderate, dim move of death” (Dowling 79). With this stated, it is significant for the achievement of a relationship for its members to continually search for ways for singular development. As per ongoing examinations directed in the United Kingdom, an attention on disloyalty as the primary driver for separate has moved onto a marvel called “dropping out of affection” (Dowling 102). This marvel is reflected in the reality there is the same old thing to find about the other individual and the reasons that made them experience passionate feelings for blur away as time passes by. Expressed compactly, holding fast to a “safe place” in the relationship is somewhat hazardous. An agreeable relationship is set apart by effectively overlooking self-awareness. All things considered, the fact of the matter is improving and dealing with yourself helps assemble a superior and more extravagant relationship with your accomplice. The primary motivation behind why it is hard for individuals to leave connections which have become vapid is just a couple of consider individual improvement as one of the key factors in fixing their organization. Couples need to remain fascinating for one another, as when there is nothing new to find, the relationship can get delicate. Moreover, unscripted TV dramas us how to be a couple: each accomplice ought to have high confidence to adapt better to the inescapable unfriendly issues that are introduced in one’s life (Dowling 56). “Accomplices with low confidence read a lot into issues, considering them to be an indication that their accomplice’s expressions of love and responsibility may be fading. They at that point discredit their accomplice and diminish closeness. Being less touchy to dismissal, nonetheless, accomplices with high confidence certify their accomplice notwithstanding any danger. Incidentally, a ceaseless requirement for acknowledgment may bring about low confidence, individuals seeing indications of dismissal where none exist, unnecessarily debilitating connections” (Murray 202). In any case, numerous individuals don’t understand that keeping up a relationship is close to home work. Unrecognized and uncertain issues may bring about an arrangement of dissatisfactions in the relationship, which proceed until an individual understands the genuine explanations behind disappointment. There are a few fundamental things to recall about a solid relationship. Numerous couples feel threatened, as they accept they will be misjudged, chuckled at, or that the relationship will break on account of what they said. This dread appears to be intolerable, however trust is basic (Murray 200). People with higher confidence are increasingly genuine about what they need and need from their accomplices. They talk about what the relationship is missing as opposed to holding up until the accomplice surmises the potential issues that have emerged. Another significant factor is having a public activity outside of a sentimental relationship. It is very hurtful for couples to harp just on one another. New impressions, contacts, and colleagues are critical for a sound relationship. Accomplices ought to likewise try to be intriguing to one another, learn new exercises to have new points to discuss, and search for novel approaches to get to know each other. The budgetary side of the issue additionally assumes its job. At the point when the two accomplices are financially autonomous, it is more uncertain one will feel worried about being the sole provider and the other will feel shaky as a result of having no consistent salary (Dowling 124). There are no careful guidelines with regards to such a private wonder as a sentimental relationship. Each couple should look for what works best for them, as each couple is remarkable. Be that as it may, it tends to be sensibly expressed that so as to construct a solid and enduring relationship, couples should give more consideration to their own characters. It is very troublesome, or even inconceivable, to improve the relationship itself, or change a few highlights of an accomplice which one doesn’t care for. The key point is to rehash yourself. In spite of being an appearing mystery, the more consideration you pay to your own life and advancement, the more extravagant the relationship will turn into. References Dowling, Richard. “Not in a Mess: Romantic Relationships.” Time 20 Nov. 2001. 56-58. Print Murray, Anna. Taking It to the Next Level in Your Relationship. New York: Black Bourbon Press, 2008. Print.>