Write My Essay We are the most trusted essay writing service. Get the best essays delivered by experienced UK & US essay writers at affordable prices.
We can work on The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes
The scenario provided is below A 45-year-old woman presents with a chief complaint of the 3-day duration of shortness of breath, cough with thick green sputum production, and fevers. Patient has a history of COPD with chronic cough but states the cough has gotten much worse and is interfering with her sleep. Sputum is thicker and harder for her to expectorate. CXR reveals flattened diaphragm and increased AP diameter. Auscultation demonstrates hyper resonance and coarse rales and rhonchi throughout all lung fields.
Assignment (2-pages case study analysis). Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, No plagiarism and references.
In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided above, explain the following:
⢠The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms. ⢠Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning. ⢠How these processes interact to affect the patient.
Sample Solution
According to George E. Moore, ethical claims all concern human conduct while philosophical ethics ultimately concerns itself with knowledge of what âgoodâ is. Moore also believes philosophical ethics ought to concern itself with what is good instrumentally, or good as a means rather than good as an end, as a property. According to Moore, what is intrinsically good, or the property of âgoodnessâ is not an analyzable property. For Moore, what âgoodâ is, or âgoodnessâ, as an individual property, is âunanalyzableâ, or, undefinable. Therefore, any claim which gives a definition of âgoodnessâ is attributing goodness to something, rather than identifying what goodness itself, as a property, is. Moore accuses those who make this error of committing the ânaturalistic fallacyâ. He believes that moral naturalists â philosophers who maintain that moral properties exist and can be objectively studied, through biology and sciences â are primarily responsible for this mistake. Moore thought philosophers committed the naturalistic fallacy when attempting to define âgoodâ by moving from one claim that a thing is âgoodâ to the claim that âgoodâ is that thing. Moore thought one could not identify âgoodâ with a thing one believes is âgoodâ. In order to test and determine whether an attempt at defining âgoodâ is correct and not a concealed assignment is what Moore called the âopen question argument.â Moore proposed that if âgoodnessâ is a natural property, then there is some correct explanation of which natural property it is. For example, maybe âgoodnessâ is the same property as âpleasantnessâ, or the same property as being âdesirableâ. Further, a correct property must be identified to fill in an identity statement of the form âgoodness = __________â, or, âwhat is good is _________â. This kind of identity statement can be correct only if both terms on either side of the identity sign are synonyms for proficient speakers who understand both terms. Synonymy of the two terms is then tested through substitution of a term. Mooreâs idea is>
According to George E. Moore, ethical claims all concern human conduct while philosophical ethics ultimately concerns itself with knowledge of what âgoodâ is. Moore also believes philosophical ethics ought to concern itself with what is good instrumentally, or good as a means rather than good as an end, as a property. According to Moore, what is intrinsically good, or the property of âgoodnessâ is not an analyzable property. For Moore, what âgoodâ is, or âgoodnessâ, as an individual property, is âunanalyzableâ, or, undefinable. Therefore, any claim which gives a definition of âgoodnessâ is attributing goodness to something, rather than identifying what goodness itself, as a property, is. Moore accuses those who make this error of committing the ânaturalistic fallacyâ. He believes that moral naturalists â philosophers who maintain that moral properties exist and can be objectively studied, through biology and sciences â are primarily responsible for this mistake. Moore thought philosophers committed the naturalistic fallacy when attempting to define âgoodâ by moving from one claim that a thing is âgoodâ to the claim that âgoodâ is that thing. Moore thought one could not identify âgoodâ with a thing one believes is âgoodâ. In order to test and determine whether an attempt at defining âgoodâ is correct and not a concealed assignment is what Moore called the âopen question argument.â Moore proposed that if âgoodnessâ is a natural property, then there is some correct explanation of which natural property it is. For example, maybe âgoodnessâ is the same property as âpleasantnessâ, or the same property as being âdesirableâ. Further, a correct property must be identified to fill in an identity statement of the form âgoodness = __________â, or, âwhat is good is _________â. This kind of identity statement can be correct only if both terms on either side of the identity sign are synonyms for proficient speakers who understand both terms. Synonymy of the two terms is then tested through substitution of a term. Mooreâs idea is>
Is this question part of your Assignment?
We can help
Our aim is to help you get A+ grades on your Coursework.
We handle assignments in a multiplicity of subject areas including Admission Essays, General Essays, Case Studies, Coursework, Dissertations, Editing, Research Papers, and Research proposals
